The Grades Are In: “A” for Pres. Obama; “D” for Jim Greer.

Grading President Obama’s Class on Civic Education: A Lesson in American Civic Education.“Yes, I’m going to have something to say to the school children tomorrow,” a defiant President Obama yells out at the Labor Day Gathering in Cincinnati, Ohio today (9-7-09).
And like a well-trained teacher, the President has already forwarded his speech to school teachers, administrators, curriculum review boards, parents, and yes, to the entire country to have it graded—even before it is to be delivered!
When the extreme paranoia from some sections of our common citizenry washes over, if ever, and we recollect our senses, the question will be, “What was the furor really all about?” Was it about those lesson plans that quickly got reworded? How dare the President ask young vibrant innocent minds how they can HELP him, the President of the United States?

Thanks, CNN, for playing clips of George Bush, Sr., asking young students exactly the same thing: “Write me a letter and tell me how you can help us achieve our goals.” OK, let’s quibble over the use of the terms “president,” rather than “our.”

Many people have pointed to racism as the one factor underlying the controversy. Others have pointed to those lesson plans as the problem behind the controversy. There has to be a cultist agenda in asking students to write a letter telling Mr. Obama what he’s done well, what he could do better, etc. No matter what terms and rewording the Dept. of Education comes up with, to me, it’s the same thing: Asking for feedback. Teachers who ask for some feedback, and it usually comes back in good and bad ratings, are usually the best teachers. The more of us that can humble ourselves enough to ask our children, neighbors, friends, pastors, and teachers for feedback on our behavior and performance, the more civil the society we will create. Of course, it can be argued that President Obama was never going to read the students’ responses. All the more reason I could not understand why these parents were getting outraged. If anything, it would have been an empowering exercise in writing and reflection for the students.

In any case, feedback is one thing many developing and struggling democracies are in dire need of. You go to some countries where you may not say anything negative about a leader and you will appreciate all over again the freedom of speech we have here. So in essence, we should not respond with anger that people questioned the speech. Jim Greer, Chairman of the Republican Party of Florida, has every right to raise a question. What we cannot excuse are close-mindedness and baseless accusations that the President was going to unleash his “socialist ideology” and indoctrinate America’s future leaders!

In the long run, President Obama gets an “A” for the text of the speech that we have all read online because it’s as good as it comes. The Department of Education gets a B+ for not standing by the lesson plans that were produced by its scholars, not by Obama. Secretary of Education, Arne Duncan, should have had them explain from an educator’s viewpoint the knowledge, skills, and attitudes that the plans were meant to elicit from our students: goal setting, accountability, personal reflection, and most of all, good citizenship.
Jim Greer gets a “D” for his irrational and unsubstantiated statements. It wasn’t really about parental choice either. Are these parents not American citizens? After listening to him tonight and hearing no apologies for provoking more ignorance and fear within his party, I downgrade him to an “F.” Thank God for Mrs. Laura Bush, always a class act, for speaking up on the side of sanity.

The rest of us Americans, together with our school children, have constituted the classroom in which President Obama will have his one day as the “guest presenter” in our nation’s classrooms, thanks to technology, innovation, and yes, an intellectually-minded president. Educators bring in parents and community leaders into their classrooms all the time to talk to their students. It makes for more relevant and meaningful learning.

However, I leave the grading to each family. For those students who stay in school, let your parents, teachers, and guardians know what you gained from listening to President Obama. Your grades will range from A-C. For those students (and parents) who “boycott” the speech, your grade is already pre-determined: “W” for Withdrawn. You’ll have to take this civics class another time; it’s a core course for every American citizen to respect our democracy, respect the president, value our freedom to think and engage critically as educated and informed citizens. Fear, false accusations, and misinformation should have no place in our civic and democratic society. End of Class.

Advertisements

6 thoughts on “The Grades Are In: “A” for Pres. Obama; “D” for Jim Greer.

  1. It all boils down to fear! When we allow the media to be the only gatekeepers of information, we are doomed- whether before the election, during the election or during Obama’s presidency. We have become a paranoid nation- listening with fear to what the talking heads have to say. Considering the responses we have been getting towards healthcare reform and the President’s speech to schoolchildren, I am concerned that the dissidents have already brainwashed their children They do not need Obama’s speech to do that. The very filth they are spewing in the media has already been expressed within the hearing of their children at the homefront. The real fear is that these bright young minds will get to hear for themselves and make up their own minds without their parents’ “good intentions”

    1. The children are thinking for themselves. I’ll tell you the worst kind of indoctrination taking place is when people choose, solely listen to, and believe everything one talking head/media outlet puts out. We cannot yield to fear.

  2. Your grading was very fair and, I would say, generous for Jim Greer. What I fail to understand is why some people feel that our republic is strenghtened when we ascribe sinister motives to everything President Obama does or proposes. Presdiential speeches to students did not start with this president. The request for a follow up by the students is not novel either. What I see happening is that the president’s opponents (political, social, economic, religious, and yes, racial) have decided to fight everything he does with lies and misinformation. The health care issue has been turned on its head by similar outrageous lies and slander. Some have called him Hitler, and others have accused him of planning to deny health care to old and/or handicapped people through euthanasia. None of these is true but it hasn’t stopped them. I can go on, but it doesn’t change any mind on the opposition side. This is not simply ideological opposition to a president one did not vote for. It goes way beyond the pale and we all know what it is!

    1. You are not alone in thinking I was too nice with Greer’s grade. A friend of mine who is a Republican himself graded him worse! If people like my friend don’t speak up, they will only have themselves to blame for such pointless opposition. If people have to oppose an idea, a plan, or a concept, at least they should do so armed with correct information and analysis. You would think. For instance, how in the world could a government-run OPTION totally shut down private enterprises? The US Postal Service hasn’t run UPS out, has it? How could a citizen say something like, “I didn’t vote for him, so he’s not my president!” We can’t be silent either.

  3. Just as predicted you just can’t help yourself. You have to do something to make conservatives out as “bad” even while admiring Laura Bush.

    Where was that admiration while she was in the White House.

    And the democrats went nuts when George H.W. Bush gave a speech.

    Hypocrisy at its finest. I neither Democrat or Republican but this whole someone has to be “good” and someone “bad” is killing our country.
    Just as Obama had the right to speak, others have the right to criticize. Telling school children or adults that someone gets an F for using their constitutional right is just WRONG.

    1. Hi Brenda,
      Glad you commented.
      You may have missed my comment about not being mad at Greer for the very same reason you provided: freedom of speech, which we are all entitled to. Here’s my excerpt from above again: So in essence, we should not respond with anger that people questioned the speech. Greer and his cohorts have every right to question.
      He only received a “D” because he didn’t base his questions on any actual facts, such as a copy of the speech. He himself turned around after reading the text of the speech to say he would let his children listen to the president. It was an unwarranted rush to judgment. And did you notice I gave Obama’s Sec. of Education only a B+? And you’re right, I’ve always admired Laura Bush, so this isn’t a one-sided grading scale. I do grade quite fairly based on the evidence in front of me. Again, so glad we’re talking civilly.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s